Loom · AI add-on · 0 to 1 launch
Worth paying for
Loom AI’s beta produced the largest engagement gain the product had ever seen but no revenue at all, because there was no way to charge for it. I designed the trial, packaging, and purchase moments that turned it into a business.
What happened
- 40%
- of launch revenue came through the launch modal
- +7%
- video-first views in beta, the largest engagement gain of the period
How it got there
A successful beta that made no money
Loom AI was approaching general availability. The beta had been hugely successful, driving the largest engagement gains the product had seen, but none of it was translating into revenue yet. My team was brought in to solve that, with a mission to design and launch an add-on package.
Testing hypotheses to build the package
We knew we were building an add-on. Almost nothing else was settled: which features were in it, which user types could buy it, or how it sequenced against the core launch. We used painted door and A/B tests to put options in front of users, gather data, and make iterative decisions on packaging and launch.
Designing next to an AI team
The commercial side of an AI product is not separable from the product side. I was designing how people would meet and pay for these features while the core team was still settling what the features would do, which meant the two shaped each other week to week.
- What you can build determines what gets packaged. The core team deciding which features were scoped into launch impacted where the add-on boundaries fell.
- The AI features are difficult to paywall the usual way, leading to the new banner pattern above.
- Loom’s trials had always been time-based. This one metered videos, which meant new patterns for showing what you had left and what happened when it ran out.
What I took from it
The design system is a tool, not a rule
Like any tool it should be used critically. On this project we departed from the system deliberately, because the existing paywall pattern could not support what we needed. The departure and incorporation of an exciting sub-brand into the product ended up driving revenue.
Design became the source of truth
This launch pulled in product, core, marketing, and data. With that many moving pieces people needed one place to check which features shipped, in which package, and in what order. People came to rely on design files as a source of truth, because diagrams were faster to interpret than docs.